Equity Selection Framework · v14 · 27 July 2026
How a business becomes a position
One precondition, three hard gates, a ten-year destination, then eight pillars weighed together. Evidence is gathered first; the verdict is authored last, and logged with its date.
Are the cash flows simple and predictable enough to forecast a ten-year destination at all? If not, the analysis stops here — you cannot value what you cannot predict. A complex composite can clear this, but only barely, and the compromise is named rather than waved through.
Any single failure ends it, regardless of price. The gates run before valuation — a cheap price never rescues a failed gate.
Picture the business fully scaled in ten years and reason backwards. Do I believe in that end-state enough to own it the whole way? Everything below is judged against the destination, not the quarter.
Each is scored clears / weak / fails. This is a weighing, not eight gates — a name does not need all eight — but every compromise is named in the verdict, and the business and the people are never compromised on.
Informational, analytical, or psychological? Only a psychological edge — the ability to hold to the destination when others cannot — is durable. If the honest answer is “informational,” reconsider.
Conviction × value sets the weight: no hard cap, roughly ten names, most of the book in the best few. Get paid for uncontrollable risk you can price; refuse moats resting on knowledge you cannot have.
The pillar scorecard and gates, the opportunity type, the named edge, the sizing and risks underwritten, every named compromise, and the one fact that would most change the thesis — the falsifiable test. Sell only for opportunity cost. The verdict is what every annual re-run is graded against.
Evidence only. No ratings, no recommendations — not investment advice. See the research →